Alexander
Elementary School
Houston,
TX
Printable Case Study
AlexanderUpdated2_06_LR.pdf

Engineering Firms:
Stephen M. Redding, P.E. Inc.
Houston, TX |
Greenheck
Representative:
Mechanical Reps, Inc.
San Antonio, TX |
The Ventilation Challenge
- Comply
to ventilation
codes
- Control
indoor humidity
- Recommend
cost-
effective solution
Like many schools
constructed in the early 1980s,
Alexander Elementary was
designed to conserve energy.
One energy saving approach
the industry endorsed at that
time was to reduce the outdoor
air ventilation to 5 cfm per person, thereby reducing the
amount of energy needed to
condition the outdoor air.
Unfortunately, that effort to
save energy in the 1980s
prevented the school from
meeting ventilation codes in
1997. ASHRAE Standard 62-89
now prescribes 15 cfm per
student. Houston’s code can
require even more outdoor air
depending on the school
design.
To comply with the local
code, the Alief Independent
School District needed to
quadruple the amount of
outdoor air entering the
Alexander school. The district
also wanted a reliable
ventilation solution that would
fit its budget, be easy to
maintain and help control
indoor humidity — always an
important concern in the humid
Houston climate.
Greenheck's Solution
- Energy
Recovery
Ventilators
The HVAC engineering firm
of Stephen M. Redding P.E., Inc.
determined that the most costeffective
and efficient solution
for the school district would be
to add several Greenheck rotary
energy recovery ventilators into
the existing system. Five roofmounted
Greenheck ERVs were
selected to provide 20,215 cfm
of outdoor air to the school or
approximately 20 cfm per
student. Four ERVs served the
classrooms and one met the
needs of the gymnasium and
cafeteria. Existing air handlers
and chillers were used, and
installation required little
additional ductwork to connect the ERVs to the return ducts.
The installed ERVs pre-condition the outdoor air by
recovering energy from air
being exhausted from the
school. Enthalpic energy
recovery efficiencies typically
range from 70%-80%. The preconditioned outdoor air is then
injected into the return duct and
supplied to the room spaces
using the existing air
distribution system.
Data for the gymnasium /cafeteria ERV unit
quantifies both sensible
and latent energy
transfer performance.
Outdoor air volume is
4,900 cfm and exhaust
air volume is 4,345 cfm.
Summer design was 95
DB/78 WB for outdoor
air and 75 DB/62 WB room air. At 75% effectiveness,
the ERV leaving temperatures
were 80 DB/67 WB reducing
the air conditioning load by 18 tons. At winter design, the ERV
heats the outdoor air from 20
DB to 59 DB.
The Results
“Students and teachers have noticed a significant improvement in indoor air quality.”
— Mathew Browne, Alief ISD Energy Manager
Since initial operation in August, 1997, CO2 levels have been reduced by 50% from peak
occurrences of 1,800 ppm to 900 ppm. Indoor humidity levels consistently match the design
objectives of 50% +-5%.“Students and teachers have noticed a significant improvement in indoor air
quality,” says Alief ISD Energy Manager Mathew Browne.
Without the ERVs, 68 additional tons of air conditioning would have been
required. That savings nearly offset the initial cost of the ERVs, and when you consider
that the school will save over $9,500 annually in reduced heating and cooling costs, the ERVs’ payback period is less than one year.
In addition to satisfying
thermal performance, the
Greenheck ERVs also met the requirements for low maintenance. Quality blowers
and sturdy galvanized steel cabinetry assure reliable airflow performance. The self-cleaning,
easy access enthalpy wheel transfers moisture in the vapor phase eliminating the need for a
drain system. All that’s required for maintenance is changing the outdoor air filters periodically
and conducting an annual inspection.
The school district is so impressed, it’s planning to retrofit three more schools with Greenheck ERVs. “Because of the positive results at Alexander Elementary, we have specified ERVs for other school districts
with renovation and new construction projects,” said lead HVAC engineer Steve Redding.
In conclusion.
Combining total enthalpy energy recovery ventilators with common heating and air
conditioning equipment is an economical, simple and effective approach for providing
adequate ventilation to schools while meeting desired temperature and humidity requirements.